Columbia Collection Service or CCS is a debt collection agency, which receives a lot of consumer complaints to our law firm for debt harassment. Find out who they are, why they might be calling, and how you can stop them.
Columbia Collection Service, Inc. (CCS) is a third-party collection agency based in New Jersey that specializes in collecting delinquent medical bills. CCS has received consumer complaints alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), including using false or misleading information in an effort to collect a debt and threatening to take actions that cannot legally be taken. If CCS has contacted you about past due financial obligations, make sure you know your rights before you respond.
Have questions? Call us now at 844-685-9200 for a Free Case Evaluation.
Our services are absolutely FREE to you.
The harassing company pays our fees.
According to the Better Business Bureau (BBB), Columbia Collection Service, Inc. was founded and incorporated in 1985. The BBB established a profile page for CCS in 1996, and CCS has been accredited by the BBB since 2013. CCS is listed as a collection agency, billing service, and payment processing service that uses the following alternate business names: Columbia Credit Services, Columbia Services, CCSI, Columbia Credit, Columbia Payment Processing Company, Columbia Recovery, and Columbia Credit & Collection Service.
According to its website, CCS “applies… knowledge, experience, and capabilities to a variety of areas of business and industry” in an effort to “create a collection experience that is in alignment with clients’ brand and revenue cycle.” CCS states that it has “disrupted the collections industry with a unique approach—treat everyone with dignity and respect and create positive outcomes for everyone involved.” CCS has “offices in Oregon and Washington…and… represents some of the most visible and respected organizations in the Pacific Northwest and beyond.”
CCS accepts delinquent accounts from a variety of industries, including healthcare providers; financial services companies; residential and commercial property management companies; small businesses; utility service providers; automotive finance lenders; education lenders; veterinarians; and government agencies. In addition, CCS provides commercial business-to-business collection services; judgement recovery services; and professional outsourcing services for “industries such as law offices, accountants, architecture, medical practitioners, and IT professionals.”
CCS states that it “stays on top of the regulatory climate of the collection industry and has implemented an effective Compliance Management System…that reduces liability and exposure.” CCS “offers training to …partners in areas such as Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)/collection laws, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) recommended best practices, bankruptcy law, and call de-escalation techniques for…staff and/or leadership teams.” However, their Consumers page only offers third-party disclosure forms and proposed payment plans; there are no links or references to consumer protection laws, resources, or enforcement agencies.
As of January 2019, the BBB has closed 18 complaints against Columbia Collection Service in the preceding three years, with 3 complaints closed in the previous 12 months. All of those complaints were concerned with billing and collection issues. Since May 2015, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has closed 21 complaints against CCS. Justia lists at least 7 cases of civil litigation involving CCS.
Columbia Collection Service, Inc.
10888 SE Main St., Ste. 200
Milwaukie, OR 97222-7697
Telephone: (503) 635-9885
It is illegal for a debt collector to threaten to sue you or garnish your wages. It is also unlikely CCS would sue you for a debt you may not owe or they cannot validate. However, debt collection agencies are known to have summoned debtors to court and garnish wages after a default judgement. Contacting an attorney BEFORE this could possibly happen would be a smart move. We’ve helped thousands of consumers fight back against unscrupulous debt collection harassers. Find out if we can help you too today!
Click 844-685-9200 ☎ NOW to call us or go ahead and fill out our Contact Form. Our services are absolutely FREE to you
Absolutely. Here are some Sample Complaints
In February 2015, in United States District Court for the District of Oregon, a judge issued an Opinion and Order in case alleging Columbia Collection Service had violated certain provisions of the FDCPA. In this case., the plaintiff alleged that CCS’ communication efforts violated his rights under Section 1692g(a); “overshadowed” his rights under Section 1692g(b); and were misleading under Section 1692e(10). CCS argued that the plaintiff’s claims were time-barred; that their communications were exempt from prosecution because they were not “initial communications”; and that they did not violate the FDCPA as a matter of law. Specifically, CCS hired an attorney to collect a judgement against the plaintiff. The attorney acting on behalf of CCS “issued three writs of garnishment against the plaintiff’s wages: one in 2007 and two more in August 2013 and October 2013. Oregon law requires that four documents be delivered to the debtor when his property is garnished: a copy of the writ of garnishment, a debt-calculation form, a notice-of-exemptions form, and a challenge-to-garnishment form.” CCS mailed these documents in connection with each garnishment. In addition, CCS, “treating each such mailing as an ‘initial communication’ under the FDCPA, …also included… a notice that the plaintiff had certain rights.” However, the plaintiff was incarcerated at the Multnomah County Justice Center at the time of the garnishment, so he never received the initial communication.
The plaintiff alleged that Columbia Collection Service’s debt collection attempts violated Section 1692g of the FDCPA, which “defines the obligations of a debt collector in connection with its ‘initial communication’ with a consumer and during the period immediately thereafter”; and Section 1692e, which prohibits debt collectors from using ‘false, deceptive, or misleading representations’ to collect on a debt.” The plaintiff did not receive the initial communication sent by CCS due to his incarceration. Subsequent communication efforts failed to include statements of his rights during the debt collection process. The plaintiff argued that because from his perspective these subsequent attempts were “initial communication,” they violated the FDCPA. The court disagreed, indicating that CCS fulfilled its responsibility, and the plaintiff’s incarceration, while unfortunate, did not alter the fact that the required statements had been included in the initial mailing. However, the plaintiff argued that the subsequent “mailings contained at least one inconsistency that could” be considered misleading. Specifically, they included a “challenge-to-garnishment form, with a statement in all-capitals lettering, that admonished the plaintiff that he “MAY NOT USE THE CHALLENGE TO GARNISHMENT FORM TO CHALLENGE THE VALIDITY OF THE DEBT.” According to the law, “A debt-collection letter is deceptive where it can ‘reasonably be read to have two or more different meanings, one of which is inaccurate.’” The court agreed that the statement used by CCS could be interpreted to mean “either (1) the consumer cannot challenge the debt at all or (2) the consumer can challenge the underlying debt, just not through the garnishment forms.” As a result, although the court denied the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgement with regard to Section 1692(g), they granted his motion under Section 1692e.
The Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) are enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).
The FDCPA regulates the behavior of collection agencies by prohibiting actions such as the use of abusive or threatening language; harassment; or the use of false or misleading information to collect a debt.
The FCRA regulates how collection agencies and creditors report delinquent debts to credit reporting agencies. Additional consumer protection laws include the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA). The complaint above illustrates how these laws can be extremely effective tools to hold accountable collection agencies who fail to adhere to their provisions.
These laws also provide individuals with a means to seek monetary damages in court. For example, the FDCPA allows consumers who have been violated to recover damages of up to $1,000, plus attorney fees and court costs.
Seek legal assistance to find the relief you may be entitled to if you are having difficulty resolving disputes with a debt collection agency
Your debt harassment checklist:
- You are receiving multiple calls per week from third party collection agencies
- You are receiving early morning or late night calls from debt collectors
- You are receiving calls at work from a debt collection agency
- Debt collectors are calling your friends, neighbors, or coworkers
- Collectors are threatening you with violence, lawsuit, or arrest
- A debt collector attempts to collect more than you owe
- You are being threatened with negative credit reporting
- A debt collector attempts to intimidate you
- Criminal accusations are being made towards you
- Use of obscene language during an attempt to collect
- Automated robocalls are being made to your phone in an attempt to collect
If you’ve been harassed by debt collectors and even one of these has happened to you, we can help. We will fight for your rights.
We can make them STOP!✋
The Lemberg Law legal team is committed to holding debt collectors accountable, so complete our form for a FREE case evaluation, or call 844-685-9200 NOW.
What Our Clients are Saying
“The group at Lemberg Law was professional, courteous, and effective. Their grasp of consumer protection laws and guidelines are second to none, and they work extremely difficult to ensure this procedure is client-friendly.”
“After a few months of frustration with a debt collector, I eventually called Lemberg Law. It was among the best financial decisions I have ever made. Jody and her staff were comprehensive, useful, and above all else powerful. I highly recommend their services and thank them for their continual efforts.”
“I just wanted to let you know we received the check from your office on now and I wanted to take some time to inform you that we really appreciate all of your efforts in this matter.”
We can absolutely help. Call us today.
Have you had a bad experience with this agency’s debt collectors? Sound off and share your experience with other visitors in the comment box below.